>In a message dated 3/17/2004 9:58:19 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >First, there is the problem of the camera range. Do you see any entry level and top end DSLR cameras beside the *ist D? I mean something to equal (at least!) the former MZ-system, as in my opinion, the *ist D is the MZ-5/MZ-3 of a DSLR system.
>So, what about a PZ1/MZ-S class SLR featuring a more powerful AF motor than that of the *ist D (just to name a feature)? >Then, when will we see a decent mid-class telephoto zoom lens (50-150 f/4 or the like)? >What about USM? >What about IS? >I could go further, but I believe you can get the meaning of my concern. >Dario Bonazza I agree. It's why I switched to Canon, although I like the Pentax UI 10X-100X better. And I have now just bought a used Canon 300D (not arrived yet). There is good AF, USM, IS, and a digital upgrade path for me. Marnie aka Doe One does have to consider these things. Or at least, I do.
