"Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >You might consider accessing images ONLY via a program that spits >them to the end user. It takes more CPU time but does secure them. > >The program could also, when it sees referencing URL that's NOT >either the current site, spit out an image copyright statement and >a BILL for use of the image. Perhaps even a replacement image that >states the developer's copyright violation.
http://wsabstract.com/howto/htaccess10.shtml -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
