File created by the tool says BadPixels are 100. I kept camera in manual mode and changed the shutter speed.
Thanks Ramesh --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You haven't really indicated how many hot or dead > pixels you have, > and at what shutter speeds. > Dead or hot pixels are an unfortunate fact of life > with digital > cameras. > > On my own camera, I didn't record any dead pixels at > any shutter > speed, and I am not getting any hot pixels until > over 1/2 second, at > which time they seem to jump exponentially in number > as the exposure > time increases. > > William Robb > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ramesh Kumar" > Subject: Have I got really bad piece()? > > > > I ran > http://www.starzen.com/imaging/deadpixeltest.htm > > on my *istD and following are the results( shown > > against "Results" in the dialogbox). > > > > I am running 1.11 firmware and shot with lens cap > on. > > Test1 uses TIFF & Test2 is RAW. > > > > I have doubts > > 1) Why am I getting so many dead pixels? > > 2) Why are H/D pixles jump to Megs? > > 3) Have I got really bad piece? > > 4) Is this because of bad firmware? > > > > Test1 > > ------- > > Hot/Dead pixels > > TIFF(200asa), NR-off NR-On > > 1/8 0/6M 0/13 > > 1/6 0/6M 0/6M > > 1/4 0/6M 0/6M > > 1/2 0/6M 0/6M > > 1 5M/6M 0/6M > > 2 6M/6M 6M/6M > > > > Test2 > > ------ > > RAW(200asa), NR-off NR-On > > 1/8 0/6M 0/6M > > 1/6 6M/6M 0/6M > > 1/4 6M/6M 0/6M > > 1/2 6M/6M 6M/6M > > 1 6M/6M 6M/6M > > 2 6M/6M 6M/6M > > > > Any suggestions are welcome. > > > > Thanks > > Ramesh > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ > > > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
