Allow me to state a different opinion on this. I wouldn't ditch the RTF for a .98x
magnificaton of the viewfinder.
I like the RTF as on my MZ5. I think it's very good and comes very handy (given it's
limitations and although not as versatile as my 500FTZ).
(And anyone on this list can call me anything: - a snapshooter, a dilettant, a
photographer, a pro etc.... :) )
Lasse, (not too impressed by the various definitions and labeling of different kind of
picture shooters.)
Tom R. wrote:
> Never met a photographer who liked them, the snapshooters seem
> to love them though (or is thuf?). BTW, my definition of a
> photographer is someone who wants to control the picture, a
> snapshooter just wants a pic, not necessarily a good pic, just a
> pic.
> --Tom
>
>
> William Robb wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: April 6, 2001 3:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye)
> >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "William Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > Show of
> > > > hands: How many folks would ditch the RTF on a ZX-5n
> > > > (or MZ-S for that matter) for a .98x magnification
> > > > viewfinder? Mine's raised.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > William in Utah.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Absolutely YES, but I suppose you already knew that.
> > Anthony Farr
> >
> > Yup. I hate the little buggers anyway.
> > William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
