I've used the 50mm f2.8 A lens a fair bit as a walkaround kit with the *istD. Quite 
good but a bit long. For macro I prefer the Tamron 90mm f2.8 or the Pentax 100mm f2.8. 
I haven't found a good 'standard' prime yet, and tend to use the 24-90mm zoom. I'd 
love to get a 31mm ltd, bit they're a bit pricey.

Getting back on topic, one thing I have found that works well is the AF140C ringflash. 
It exposes correctly at 200 ISO, and probably at other speeds but I haven't tried it 
yet.

The other thing that works well is the microscope adaptor. I don't get the vignetting 
that appears with some eyepieces on 35mm.

I hope to do some more experiments with the bellows and tubes when I have a week off 
work next week. Won't need them on Thursday though as I'm photographing leopards at a 
big cat sanctuary.

Nick


-----Original Message-----
    From: "J. C. O'Connell"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Sent: 15/04/04 00:44:27
    To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Subject: RE: Macro with the isD?
    
    Thats nice, but anything taken at smaller apertures with
    more detail? Also 90mm is pretty long for a APS sensor
    which of course is good for some things, but I'm thinking
    a 50mm Macro lens would be a nice setup for APS, no?
    JCO
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       J.C. O'Connell   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://jcoconnell.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:26 PM
    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Subject: Re: Macro with the isD?
    
    
    I shot this at approximately 1:2 with the *ist D and the Vivitar Series
    1 90/2.5: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2220242
    On Apr 14, 2004, at 6:28 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
    
    > Anyone with personal experience using the
    > istD for MACRO work, say 1:4 and closer?
    > I would think the smaller sensor size, which
    > allows greater DOF for an equivalent field
    > of view would be a great application of
    > the camera.  Possibly any web pages with
    > samples?
    >
    > JCO
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > -----
    >    J.C. O'Connell   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://jcoconnell.com
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > -----
    >
    
    

Reply via email to