Kevin,
I can't speak on the FA20/2.8 or A20/2.8, but I do love the FA*24/2. It can
be pure magic in terms of picture quality. I remember sharpness and an
unanticipated dimensionality in the photos. It made me stop using my M28/2.8
as I couldn't stand it any longer.
The M20/4 is a nice compact lens, but wide for my tastes and not in the same
league as the FA*24/2 for quality. The older K20/4 is a bigger, but similar.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< OK. Why is the FA* 24/2 getting votes and the FA 20/2.8 getting none.
I had pretty much decided on the FA 20/2.8. You know, like the car
commercial, Wider is Better. It seems that some combination of * glass and
a slightly faster lens is the preference. Is 20 mm too wide for most
applications? I keep admiring the pictures a friend is taking with a 14 mm
Sigma.
Help me out. >>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
