I agree, not worth $50 but not the dog it's made out to be. Definitely not a paperweight.
I loved mine. Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:49 PM Subject: Re: Takumar 135/2.5 (Bayonet) any good? > $50.00 is too much to spend on a paperweight. Well I've over stated the > case. It's not a great lens > to some people it might not even be considered a good lens. I should > think you could get it for less. >
