http://www.asmp.org/information/guides/copyrightguide.html#006
--Tom
William Robb wrote:
>
> The following was gleaned from the Cornell University website.
> This looks very similar to the Canadian ownership clause. It
> would be intersting to see what minds sharper than mine have to
> say about copyright ownership in the case of a wedding job where
> no formal contract exists to exclude the ownership clause.
> William Robb
>
> http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/201.html
> (b) Works Made for Hire. - In the case of a work made for hire,
> the employer or other person for whom the work was prepared is
> considered the author for purposes of this title, and, unless
> the parties have expressly agreed otherwise in a written
> instrument signed by them, owns all of the rights comprised in
> the copyright.
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
