They could have gotten rid of it, if they had used ED elements. It's that simple, typically lenses with that type of glass cost a bit more though.
-That Guy -----Original Message----- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: First smc-DA14/2.8 impressions Here's a question since not everyone has PS CS or other programs: Why can't these lenses be made so there's no or minimal CA? Seems to me that all the digi folks have gotta put up with this crap, and the solution offered is to go buy a $600.00 program to remove it in the editing process. Regular lenses pretty well dispensed with that years ago. Feh! Shel > [Original Message] > From: Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 6/27/2004 3:06:11 PM > Subject: Re: First smc-DA14/2.8 impressions > > have you tried a tool to remove the chromatic abberation. there is one in > the Photoshop CS converter and there are other programs that have it as a > built-in function like Picture Window Pro. > > Herb.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "pdml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 5:29 PM > Subject: Re: First smc-DA14/2.8 impressions > > > > "I do see some CA in the corners,"
