Hi Bill, I'm inclined to agree with el gringo (who the hell is THAT! Maybe a friend of That Guy? <LOL>)
Yes, the tree or bush is obviously obscuring a boring sky and a putrid-green grass. The field of yellow should be orange, the sky darker, the foreground foreshadowed, and the depth of field minimized. In fact, you should have used a different lens, different camera, moved to Kentucky, and made a wide-angle shot of some toothells trailer park trash surrounded by rusting cars up on blocks and a three legged dog chained to a tree stump. I can see where you were headed with this, however, you should have made a right turn at Winnipeg instead of a left at the 7-11. Other than those small nits, it's perfect, and I like it ... really do. Shel > [Original Message] > From: El Gringo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 7/5/2004 9:34:28 PM > Subject: RE: PAW > > I like what you were going for. If the sky was blue, and not cloudy, and > the grass in the foreground cleaner, I'd be inclined to like it. As it > stands, its rather boring. Also, I think I would ditch the tree there, and > focus on the horizontal aspects. > > -el gringo > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:18 AM > To: Pentax Discuss > Subject: PAW > > > Rip it apart... > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP3990.jpg > > William Robb
