Tom C wrote:
Rome never did become Christian. It became "Christian".
Is that your way of saying, "in name only?" I can't think of any other way of interpreting those two sentences.
keith whaley
And you're way over the top.
Tom C.
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: civil discourse (was Re: PAW: Temptation of Eve, the three shot series)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:00:55 -0400
"My values are the only "right" ones. If you do not subscribe to them with every bit of your mind, body, and soul you are damned! If you do not I have the duty to send you to the maker for judgment right now."
Are those the values you are talking about?
100 years ago the white, puritan, English descended, culture here dictated right and wrong. They were right, and everyone else in the world was wrong. Of course they came to America because they wanted to get away from all those evil degenerate people in England.
Actually, though, to my way of thinking, intolerance and hypocrisy was the only thing they actually practiced.
In my experience life is far better today then it was when I was a kid 40-60 years ago. When self-rightous "moral" "nuclear family" assholes had the "right" to abuse their kids.
And a thought to end this on, Rome never fell until after it became Christian.
REMEMBER! I DID NOT START THIS RELIGIOUS/POLITICAL SHIT THREAD! IF YOU DON'T WANT TO LOOK AT SOMEONES PHOTOS, THEN DON'T! OTHERWISE STICK YOUR HEADS BACK UP YOUR ASSHOLES WHERE THEY BELONG.
PS: I didn't much care for the photos myself.
--
Tom C wrote:
The problem I see with this whole thing is this...
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
