ISO 800 is fine. The biggest problem I have with 1600 and 3200 is that one cannot sharpen them. The noise just gets sharpened excessively. So at these speeds it is softness that bothers me, not so much the noise.
Joe
"I agree that the 3200 is virtually useless but I HAVE shot several
serviceable shots at 1600 and lots of nice stuff at 800."
ISO 800 is fine. The biggest problem I have with 1600 and 3200 is that one cannot sharpen them. The noise just gets sharpened excessively. So at these speeds it is softness that bothers me, not so much the noise.
ISO 800 is fine. The biggest problem I have with 1600 and 3200 is that one cannot sharpen them. The noise just gets sharpened excessively. So at these speeds it is softness that bothers me, not so much the noise.
- Re: Yahoo - it's here - My *ist D cbwaters
- RE: Yahoo - it's here - My *ist D Joseph Tainter
- RE: Yahoo - it's here - My *ist D Kostas Kavoussanakis
- RE: Yahoo - it's here - My *ist D Jens Bladt
- Re: Yahoo - it's here - My *ist D Frits Wüthrich
- RE: Yahoo - it's here - My *ist D Kostas Kavoussanakis
- RE: Yahoo - it's here - My *ist D Jens Bladt
