That is 35mm you fool, read the technical details before you run your idiotic mouth....
The image quality I have been talking about is from LF film, not 35mm. JCO -----Original Message----- From: Antonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. A nice image, but where is the image quality he constantly talks about? On 29/8/04 11:08 pm, "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Normally, sunset/sunrise pictures convey the moods of something > happening in a scenery, and with half the sky included to point at the > event on the horizon. This pic really close in on the part of the sky > where things happen. The contrasts tell about the two conflicting > ingredients of weather, sunlight and water vapour. > > It is a powerful and condensed (doh) image of what goes on every > morning. I too find this image outstanding. > > Jostein > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 10:47 PM > Subject: Re: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. > > >> In what respect? >> >> Shel >> >>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> I'd not consider any of these to be a "quality" image. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I think this is an outstanding image: >>> http://pug.komkon.org/03jan/sun2pug.html >> >> >> >
