Not to mention that if Pentax had a 2000mm F3.5 lens, Canon and Nikon would
be sweating bullets....
Todd
At 03:02 PM 4/28/01 +0900, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>At 27 Apr 2001 20:23:38 -0700,
>"Gerald Cermak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote;
>
>> http://www02.bhphotovideo.com/default.sph....
>
>It should be SMCP2000/13.5, not f/3.5.
>
>If it were really f/3.5, the diameter of its barrel would
>be around 60 cm. That's nonsence for a 35mm lens.
>
>Regards,
>--
>Yoshihiko Takinami
>Osaka, Japan
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
