Noise reduction will be a thing of the past, superseded by Noise removal. However, you'll have to ascertain to set "noise removal" on (while setting "nose removal" off :-)
I've been told that Pentax is already working on a "clothes reduction" function, useful for Bill Robb's calendar, but I'm afraid Canon will soon introduce a "Clothes Full Removal" function (only made possible by their unique hi-performance USM) built in the new EF-CFR series lenses ;°) Dario ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 6:39 PM Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things > i like the "eyeballs" option. > > mishka > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:05:44 +0200, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Software will fix that, removing noise, red-eye, moles, flaws, tattoos, > > eyeballs, hair and moustache from pictures, depending on your chosen > > settings :-) > > Dario > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:52 PM > > Subject: Re: When good photographers do bad things > > > > > Caveman wrote on 11.10.04 17:51: > > > > > > > While you're probably right on the MP figure, looking at current trends > > > > I suspect no one would ever bother to address the noise issues. > > > Who knows? Technology changes fast. Maybe someone will develop CCD (or > > CMOS > > > or whatever) manufacturing technology that will reduce noise > > significantly? > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards > > > Sylwek > > > > > > > > > > >
