I don't agree. I think the person in the background adds something to the picture.
DagT > fra: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Nicely done. Good pose & lighting. It would be stronger IMHO if the background > person was either not there or more out of focus. > > Kenneth Waller > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: PAW: Wearing feathers > > Hi, > this PAW from me is a bit different from my usual stuff. It's a > portrait (I hope <g>)! > > One issue I would like to hear some advice on, is the conversion to > B&W. The original was quite underexposed (it seems my for long time > trusty Metz 40MZ3i is developing exposure problems) so I converted > only using the red channel (the others were too dark because of > tungsten lighting and underexposure). As you can see, there is > problem with blown highlights on the lower left. In the other > channels they were not blown. What would be a good way to paste the > details from the other channels? My quick experiments were not good > with it. > > I originally wanted to post something different from the same venue > (it's a Forum 2000 conference on globalisation issues with some > ex-presidents like Vaclav Havel and other interesting figures, but > it was all the usual not-so-interesting news photographs I got > there). > > The URL: http://fotof.wz.cz/paw > > Comments appreciated! > > Good light! > fra > > > > ________________________________________ > PeoplePC Online > A better way to Internet > http://www.peoplepc.com > >
