www = walking with what When I started photography more seriously a couple of years ago I went to a photo course. Our teacher gave us the advice to use prime lenses, preferably normal primes, at least to start with. So for some time I only had a 50mm-lens. The last year I found a used FA 20/2.8, started to experiment with it and became really fond of the perspective it gave. During a trip to a Greek island this summer it became the favorite lens on the PZ1-p I walked around with. It produced images I am very pleased with. Sometimes, however, it made me unprepared for certain motives. I remember walking through a fantastic barren, almost moonlike coastal landscape, when suddenly a man appeared from the left carrying a huge sack filled with salt he had collected. On the photo taken with the wide angle he (of course) appeared as a tiny figure. Thus, using a 20mm as a walking around lens is not so clever. Changing lenses would have taken too much time. The obvious solution might after all be a zoom lense, like a 28-105. I am thinking about buying one now. But then again, maybe using a longer prime lens as walking around lens might be better. One mostly has more time to change to a wide angle when the picturesque landscape or the like "appears", than the other way around. At least that's what I think. So what about let's say a FA 100/2.8 (too heavy?) or the FA 135/2.8 (too long?)? I am still quite a novice so any advice is really appreciated. Thanks Peter, Sweden
