Now, if anybody could tell me what is better Soligor 20/2.8 or Mir 20/2.5 I would be happy. :)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:12 PM Subject: Re: Russian lenses > not zenitar. zenitar is fine. > > mir 20mm/2.5 does interfere. but *unlike* zenitar, nothing says that the > filter should always be used. > > best, > mishka. > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:04:30 -0700, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Doug... Someone else mentioned that the Zenitar's rear filters interfere > > with the mirrors on the A series bodies. Have you noticed any problems with > > the MZ-S? > > > > t > > > > > > > > On 10/26/04 8:09, Doug Franklin wrote: > > > > > I also have the Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye and have been really pleased > > > with it. As someone else mentioned, the colors are a bit more vivid > > > through this lens than my others, but it's also a sharp lens that > > > handles flare better than most of my non-Pentax lenses. It's built > > > like a tank, and my aperture ring is a little notchy, as someone else > > > also mentioned. But overall, it's the best $130 I've spent on a single > > > piece of camera gear, with the possible exception of the battery grip > > > for the MZ-S. Just remember that there are only so many uses for a > > > fisheye as compared to, say a 50/1.4. > > > > > > TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ > > > > >
