Only to protect the guilty.
Hey this took up valuable at work time to do this.<VBG>
Dave
> Like 47% of all statistics he made them up.
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> >Thanks for posting this. Your figures seem odd. With only 10 replies, how
> >do you arrive at these odd percentage responses?
> >
> >Shel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>[Original Message]
> >>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Date: 11/11/2004 8:58:02 AM
> >>Subject: Poll Results(long)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>7a- What lenses, Pentax or other, do you find DO NOT work well with your
> >>
> >>
> >camera/shooting
> >
> >
> >>style. (sharpness etc)
> >>
> >>
> >>>>30% mention the wides are not wide enough now.
> >>>>10% mention slower than 2.8 is a problem
> >>>>1% say long primes bring chromayic aberation
> >>>>1% mention Sigmas 15 f 2.8
> >>>>1% mention FA 24/2 and FA135/2.8 worked weel on film bodies but not the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >digital body.
> >
> >
> >>>>The rest say all is well with the lenses they own.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>8-Has digital taken the place of 35mm film shooting for you
> >>
> >>
> >>>>50% yes they shoot no film
> >>>>49% say they shoot film if hi res is needed or important work
> >>>>1% said nope.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
> >>11-Do you shoot RAW or JPEG or what is needed for the job at hand.
> >>
> >>
> >>>>RAW 40%
> >>>>JPG 40%
> >>>>BOTH 19%
> >>>>WHATS NEEDED 1%
> >>>>I noted some shot jpg ONLY if non critical work is being shot,
> >>>>or if they have a LOT of images they
> >>>>want to shoot. One was to cheap to spring for another 1GIG card.<vbg>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
> During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
> and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during
> peacetime.
> --P.J. O'Rourke
>
>
