On 11 Nov 2004 at 22:43, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > I think in that case "likelike" would be > a much better term because IMHO it is impossible > for any 2D image no matter how good to > convey the sense of real space 3D photography > gives you, even mediocre 3D photography....
If you've got one gammy eye a photograph can be quite an accurate representation of the world around. However I understand your point, the problem is that terms are misused all the time and unfortunately they seep into regular language then over time their new meanings become officially embedded. Take for example a little rechargable product I purchased the other day, it read in big bold print "7.2v Of Power", as you know this makes no sense however it seems nowadays that power pack voltage equates directly to product quality/power, go figure. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
