I've only tried this once, and IIRC, it doesn't work exactly the same way as it did on Z-1. The Z-1 would subtract some time from each exposure to make the final result correct. I think the *istD doesn't do that, but rather take all exposures straight according to the meter. Jostein ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:20 PM Subject: Multiple exposures with * ist D
> Any listers have experience using this function? > I'd like to hear of your experience/comments on using this function. Was > exposure acceptable etc? > > Kenneth Waller >
