Quoting Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have had ZX-10's - it is more capable than those. Almost like a
> film *ist, except that the film *ist has most of the dedicated
> switches. Probably a ZX-7. Electronically it can do most things
> (metering modes, continuous AF, wireless flash, etc), but must use
> menus to select all those things rather than having the switches
> readily available.
>
> The *istD is much like the PZ-1p. So, I'll say it again, those who
> want to control the settings on the camera on a regular basis, will
> like the D, those who want mostly the automation to handle things will
> be ok with the DS. If you are happy using a ZX-7, then the DS will
> make you happy. If you get frustrated using the ZX-7, you will get
> frustrated using the DS and should get the D.
Ah.
See, here's why I made the comparison the way I did.
I have a PZ-1.
My husband has a ZX-10 ('cause I bought it for him ... )
Never have lived with a ZX-7. Never seen an actual *ist. (the film one)
ERNR
