15 hot pixels at 1/6 seconds ! I hate this digital technology, should of stayed with film, there was no bad pixels there, and I bet it was sharper and with more detail. :)
1/6 seconds: [DeadPixelText] NumBadPixels=15 0=Hot,2743,212,93 1=Hot,2742,213,95 2=Hot,2743,213,156 3=Hot,2744,213,66 4=Hot,2743,214,95 5=Hot,461,319,85 6=Hot,658,713,61 7=Hot,659,713,92 8=Hot,660,713,65 9=Hot,2534,1189,61 10=Hot,1718,1533,63 11=Hot,1718,1534,99 12=Hot,1718,1535,77 13=Hot,1189,1836,76 14=Hot,1406,1928,64 1/125: [DeadPixelText] NumBadPixels=3 0=Hot,2743,213,64 1=Hot,1718,1534,79 2=Hot,1189,1836,63 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Zaninovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 12:02 PM Subject: Re: D questions > I will do a test using Dead Pixel Test software and compare the results with > PDML members. It will probably find even more than 10 > hot pixels. :) > > > If you search in the archive you may find prior discussions about hot > > pixels. I seem to recall 10 is not bad, but as I don't have a -D I may > > not remember well. >
