On 11 Dec 2004 at 18:45, John Coyle wrote:

> Just ran the Dead Pixel test on my *istD today,following Rob's method, and got
> zero dead pixels,with 26 hot ones.
> 
> Data read out is:
> [DeadPixelText]
> Version=1.0
> Description=Pentax *ist D 11/12/2004
> FileType=TIFF
> NumBadPixels=26
> 0=Hot,1921,12,62
> 1=Hot,2259,142,103
> 2=Hot,1392,256,120
> 3=Hot,1391,257,117
> 4=Hot,1392,257,208
> 5=Hot,1392,258,121
> 6=Hot,1865,896,76
> 7=Hot,1082,970,117
> 8=Hot,1081,971,117
> 9=Hot,1082,971,208
> 10=Hot,1083,971,117
> 11=Hot,1082,972,117
> 12=Hot,1998,1090,92
> 13=Hot,2007,1406,76
> 14=Hot,772,1483,63
> 15=Hot,773,1483,90
> 16=Hot,774,1483,63
> 17=Hot,399,1529,101
> 18=Hot,398,1530,100
> 19=Hot,399,1530,183
> 20=Hot,400,1530,101
> 21=Hot,399,1531,101
> 22=Hot,1032,1625,66
> 23=Hot,1032,1626,111
> 24=Hot,1032,1627,66
> 25=Hot,2135,1962,76
> 
> Is this of concern?  I'm not noticing any problem with the actual images on
> screen or in print

Hi John,

Looks to be below average, see the results below:


Method:
10 seconds manual exposure (lens capped)
200ISO
Daylight WB
NR off
Saturation setting (middle)
Sharpness setting (left most)
Contrast setting (left most)
sRGB CS
TIFF L file

15
34
80
26
11
4
44
15
46
20
84
18
100
100
29
26

Average 40.75

Cheers,


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to