On 11 Dec 2004 at 18:45, John Coyle wrote: > Just ran the Dead Pixel test on my *istD today,following Rob's method, and got > zero dead pixels,with 26 hot ones. > > Data read out is: > [DeadPixelText] > Version=1.0 > Description=Pentax *ist D 11/12/2004 > FileType=TIFF > NumBadPixels=26 > 0=Hot,1921,12,62 > 1=Hot,2259,142,103 > 2=Hot,1392,256,120 > 3=Hot,1391,257,117 > 4=Hot,1392,257,208 > 5=Hot,1392,258,121 > 6=Hot,1865,896,76 > 7=Hot,1082,970,117 > 8=Hot,1081,971,117 > 9=Hot,1082,971,208 > 10=Hot,1083,971,117 > 11=Hot,1082,972,117 > 12=Hot,1998,1090,92 > 13=Hot,2007,1406,76 > 14=Hot,772,1483,63 > 15=Hot,773,1483,90 > 16=Hot,774,1483,63 > 17=Hot,399,1529,101 > 18=Hot,398,1530,100 > 19=Hot,399,1530,183 > 20=Hot,400,1530,101 > 21=Hot,399,1531,101 > 22=Hot,1032,1625,66 > 23=Hot,1032,1626,111 > 24=Hot,1032,1627,66 > 25=Hot,2135,1962,76 > > Is this of concern? I'm not noticing any problem with the actual images on > screen or in print
Hi John, Looks to be below average, see the results below: Method: 10 seconds manual exposure (lens capped) 200ISO Daylight WB NR off Saturation setting (middle) Sharpness setting (left most) Contrast setting (left most) sRGB CS TIFF L file 15 34 80 26 11 4 44 15 46 20 84 18 100 100 29 26 Average 40.75 Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998