Thanks Carlos

It doesn't sound that bad, I expect some losses when using a TC even the 
Sigma 1.4 EX and my 300 f4 APO although it's hard to detect in that combo.

I'll give the AF a try with the MZ-3 and my backup ZX-5n when I get it, see 
how things work out :)

John



---------- Original Message -----------
From: Carlos Royo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:26:29 +0100
Subject: Re: KENKO (Teleplus) 1.5x TELECONVERTER SHQ 4 ELEMENT

> John Whittingham escribió:
> > I'm considering purchasing a Kenko 1.5x TC to go with the Sigma 135-400 
APO 
> > zoom I recently won on eBay. I've read various (conflicting) comments on 
> > performance and wondered if anyone had any experience with this 
particular TC.
> > 
> > My main concerns are optical performance and retaining AF with the Sigma 
zoom.
> > The Sigma 1.4x EX TC will not work with this lens due to the position of 
the 
> > lens rear element. Any advice, comments or alternative recommendations 
would 
> > be much appreciated.
> >
> 
> I have got one of those converters. The instruction manual says that 
> the lens needs to be f:4 or faster to keep AF. In practice, AF works 
> also with an F* 300 mm. 4.5, in bright light conditions. But AF 
> isn't only lens dependent, it also varies from camera to camera. For 
> example, if I use the F* 300 mm. + 1.7x Pentax AF converter on my Z-
> 1, AF doesn't work in any circumstances, but the same lens plus 
> teleconverter on the MZ-S autofocuses very well.
> 
> On the optical side, the Kenko is OK, but don't expect it to be as 
> good as the Pentax 1.7x AF or Pentax 1.4-S. With the Kenko you'll 
> soon notice some loss of contrast (not much), when compared to the 
> original lens without the converter, and sharpness will also be 
> slightly reduced.
> 
> Carlos
------- End of Original Message -------

Reply via email to