> poor to worse in a lot of cases. As I thought, there's still good reason to use a camera/lens combination of quality.
> OTOH, an A* 400/2.8 with the monocular > converter K does a decent job, and if the light is good enough, > using the 2X-L adapter makes for pretty high magnification. looking > through the eyepiece does give a real 4000mm spotting scope. i > suppose i could attach a P&S digicam to that. the distortion in the > monocular converter is pretty high though. Sounds like an awesome setup, but again quality would suffer albeit not as much as with a spotting scope IMHO. John ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Sent: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:50:56 -0500 Subject: Re: PESO" New Year's Day Walkaround > poor to worse in a lot of cases. OTOH, an A* 400/2.8 with the monocular > converter K does a decent job, and if the light is good enough, > using the 2X-L adapter makes for pretty high magnification. looking > through the eyepiece does give a real 4000mm spotting scope. i > suppose i could attach a P&S digicam to that. the distortion in the > monocular converter is pretty high though. > > Herb... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 2:36 PM > Subject: Re: PESO" New Year's Day Walkaround > > > I can't help but wonder what the image quality would be like at say 8x10 > :) > > The scopes optics would have to be very good indeed at that magnification. ------- End of Original Message -------
