T me it's not really digital or film. It's both. Film for me is mostly MF, though. If I could afford it, I'd certainly get myself a MZ-S again - it's a brilliant camera. Perhaps I will some day.
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. januar 2005 01:21 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: MZ-S: what is a good price ? > Thibouille wroteA;> I'm considering a purchase. But these beast seem pretty rare, even on Ebay..I sold my laptop so have a couple hundreds euros to spend :) and in my > opinion, digital is simply not mature enough. Youre right where I was a year ago. Although you might say I was even more commited to film because I was shooting almost all 6x7 MF film and a bit of 35mm film. Then a local pro showed me what he could do with 6.1 megapixel digital files shot in RAW and converted in PhotoShop CS. If you have a chance, you should look into the digital potential before you buy another 35mm film camera. I've been accused of crusading for digital. I'm not. I hope we all continue to shoot film. But i feel obligated to caution anyone who opts for an expensive 35mm film camera instead of digital. That's just my opinion. Others will disagree. Paul
