I don't see it that way -- Best regards, Bruce
Monday, January 24, 2005, 11:14:51 AM, you wrote: mw> You are wasting your time. It's a troll. mw> m mw> Gonz wrote: >> >> >> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >>> ...... >>> To get back to my original statement, there is no "digital >>> look". A photograph recorded with a digital camera looks as it >>> ought to, as a capture of light without defects intrduced by the >>> capture medium. >>> Godfrey >>> >> >> There are however, some defects introduced by the digital capture >> system. First there is the pixelization of the light by the discrete >> photosites of the CCD or Cmos chip. Second, there is noise by the >> quantization of the recorded signal by a noisy analog/digital system >> interface. Third, there is the information lost by the Bayer >> interpolation algorithm applied to convert the discrete RGB photosites >> into color values per pixel. And lastly, there is information lost due >> to the fact that the photosites do not cover the entire chip, there is >> routing/wiring that takes up 30% or so of the chip where light is not >> captured but lost. >> >> In conclusion, the final digital image contains defects also, they are >> just different types of defects from film. >> >> rg >> >> >>
