On 24/1/05, Fred, discombobulated, unleashed: >Well, this is certainly no defense of Canon lenses, and certainly is not >intended as any criticism of the FA 135/2.8 (which is a lens I'm not >familiar with), but I would just say that the FA 135/2.8 is not exactly a >"premium lens". Would any Canon 135/2.8 be all that much larger or heavier?
This is the closest Canon offering: <http://www.tanchung.com/canon/ef135mmf2x.htm> Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
