I should think that the Super A would like the cold at 3° F even less than the MX. I'd
expect the available battery power to be close to zero.


Don Sanderson wrote:

Thanks to all who replied, Jens, Mat, Thibouille, Fred
and Joe.
Now I just have to decide which one (or both?) to keep.
It was good to hear that they'll take some abuse and
still keep going.
I plan to put together a small kit to keep in the car
at all times, I've missed too many shots lately.
That means, hot, cold, damp and all the rest.
Tried it with an MX, it didn't like the cold very
much. (To be fair it was only 3 Deg F!)

Don



-----Original Message-----
From: Mat Maessen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 1:12 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Experience with Super A/Program?


My SuperProgram (SuperA) has never been anything but dead reliable. Been thinking about buying a second one as a backup body for it. It does seem to eat batteries faster than any of my other cameras, but I think I can live with that.

-Mat


On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:54:31 -0500, Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Who's had a fair amount of experience with the Super A/Program, has it
proven trustworthy and fairly consistent in it's performance?








--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to