Why not Tamron 'SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 DiLD IF'
-----Original Message----- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:01 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Digital wide angle lens You're the second person I've heard saying that the DA14 isn't particularly sharp. I'd love to see a solid lens test of this lens comparing it against others. I've taken a bunch of pictures with it and they're more than just satisfactorily sharp, but then I don't have any other Pentax mount lenses to use as a point of reference in this focal length range. Godfrey --- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone used the K or A 15/3.5 as an ultra-wide lens on the *ist D or > > DS? Maybe it's a too 'nose-heavy lens-camera combination' > > I really don't care how heavy it is but it's got the right mount and it > performs very well, probably better than the DA14/2.8 from all > the example I've seen from that lens. I've posted quite a few shots made with > the A15/3.5 *ist D combination over the last few months, maybe you missed the > posts __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
