I don't understand what you mean by - "a slide with much higher resolution".
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 1:23 PM Subject: Re: Apology and review (of Sandisk photoviewer). > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I was using full size images, fresh from the camera. Smaller ones > > would speed up loading for sure. Wonder how the "quality" fares > > when you do that? > > > > It's no alternative for a slide projector....... > > > Just as an aside; > In a local photo club we have done projections of both 35mm slides > (leica projector) and digital (Epson LCD) on the same canvas. What > strikes me as odd is that the perceived quality is higher for a > 1024x768 pixel digital image than for a slide with much higher > resolution. It's simply a lot more pleasing to look at. > > Granted, it was a PITA to get the colour adjustments right, but once > worked out the viewing experience was really stunning. > > Jostein >
