Re: Sorta got published

[Gonz]

Oh don't get me wrong, I had several close ups, but just not the ones 
they wanted.  This one got picked because he was engaged in 
conversation.  The lighting was terrible, so I had to use the ceiling to 
bounce the flash, making it difficult to move in and out of the right 
range without getting in the way.  Next time though, I'll spend most of 
my time on closeups like you say.

rg
Graywolf wrote:
Long, medium, and close-up. Typical for editors. You will learn to shoot 
all three. 90% o'the time they (editors) will use the close up, and you 
will feel the LS was the best of them because it shows context and can 
stand alone.

graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Gonz wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
 > So you gonna show us or what???  Bob S.
 >
 >
Well, here goes:  (warning, some are > 100Kbytes)
This is the original pic:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/vess-talking-orig.jpg
They asked me to crop it to this:  (shame, since if I had known they 
wanted a close crop I would have been closer/used longer lens)

http://www.g0nz.com/images/vess-talking-small.jpg
In the article, they further mangled it to this:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/vess-article-cropped.JPG
Now I've got to go find my own copy.  LOL.
rg