Arnie, I just did another test in a controlled way and could not get the 2 slave flashes to give different outputs. They are taken as a whole and the ratio you set on the slave flashes is between the slaves and the the master, be it the built-in flash or another 360.

You thus need to use distance to vary the respective output of the slaves. Or cut the output of one slave by covering its window with a neutral density gel, or a kleenex.

Andre

yes, thats what i'm talking about. i you could get that information for me i'd really appreciate it.

thanks

arnie

----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple wireless 360FGZ flash


Hi Arnie. You can change the ratio between the 2 flashes, like 1/3 for one and 2/3 for the second one. Is this what you mean? If so, I'll check in the manual to see how to do it. I've done it once and it was effective.

Andre

Jack, it works great when I do that. Just I would like to be able to control them a bit.

arnie

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple wireless 360FGZ flash

Arnie,
I think I'd allow the two 360's to do their own
exposure balancing by setting both on TTL.

Jack
--- arnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I use two 360, both triggered wirelessly from the
built in flash. I still
cant figure out how to manually control the exposure
of each, but it works
quite well automatically.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Lindamood, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:25 PM
Subject: Multiple wireless 360FGZ flash

Is it possible to work two (or more) 360's
wireless triggered by the
 built-in flash?  Has anyone tried this?








__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail



Reply via email to