It's small, it's light, it's cheap;  It's technically very capable
(8MP, 3fps, 14(JPEG)-shot buffer, RAW+JPEG, optional grip). I'd
need to get one in my hands to see how it feels, and to see if the
control layout works for me (I prefer the D to the simplified DS,
so I suspect I'd like the extra dedicated buttons on the 350/XT).

It's the 800-lb gorilla in the corner, when it comes to DSLR sales.
It's taken away much of the clear superiority of the *ist-DS, which
is going to make it harder for Pentax to gain any market share.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
> 
> What features on the XT are to like?
> 
> Jim A.
> 
> 
> 
> > Derby Chang mused:
> >>
> >> On a related note, I notice the Canon supports FAT32.  Mmm...FAT32=2
> >> Terabytes of storage. But I don't know if I'd want a huge number of
> >> unbackedup images on a large CF card. Especially on a FAT file system.
> >>
> >> The *istDS manual doesn't seem to say too much about it, but what is the
> >> maximum SD card that the DS supports? Is it FAT16 only? Not really an
> >> issue, 4GB would be plenty for me anyhow.
> >
> > The *ist-D supports FAT32, which is why you can use 4GB cards in it;
> > the FAT16 limit is 2GB.
> >
> > Another thing not to like about the canon; the 1.8" rear LCD screen,
> > with even less pixels than the 300D.
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to