that CF cards are more failure prone isn't the issue. the issue is that every CF card, regardless of size, has the most danger of failure during insertion, and the more you have to insert into anything, the more likely something will go wrong. last i heard, it wasn't possible to change the card type in a *istD, so that means the fewer insertions, the better, given that direct cable connection is both much slower and has a connector that is at least as failure prone.

Herb...
----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: IstD vs IstDS



I suspect Rob's point is that if the socket that the card is going into is poor, the possibility of bending a pin due to a crooked insertion is that much greater.
I know it has been a PITA for us, including one glorious incident where a customer managed to short something with their CF card and let all the smoke out of our countertop unit.




Reply via email to