Peter, 
Is this the SP Tamron?  I have one of these, which I
tested along side an FA 300/4.  The Tamron was sightly
longer in focal length, with slightly more contrast. 
I sent back the FA.
Bob


--- Peter Jesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just acquired a Tamron 300mm f5.6, 58mm
> filter thread in an M42 
> mount. Cost was the equivalent of $78 US. It appears
> to be in perfect 
> condition. I am just waiting on a bayonet adapter so
> I can use it. The only 
> info I could find on the web says it is sharp.
> 
> Does anyone have any experience (good or bad) with
> this lens?
> 
> My main use would be nature photography. I do a lot
> of bush walking and 
> travel light. I don't go for big blow-ups but I need
> to get shots that are 
> at least of publishable quality.
> 
> Peter
>
_________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com.
> 
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. 
> To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
> Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
> http://pug.komkon.org .
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to