I think most photographers are running monitors with 1050 pixels on the vertical. But I've been keeping my files smaller lately after some complaints.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/22/2005 4:10:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: About 650 pixels on the vertical axis is what will fit on a screen to allow viewing without scrollage. Is this the same for everyone? I mean, I assume that if it's too big for me, it's too big for everyone else, right? Or is it possible that other's computers view things differently? Anyway, yours is 975 pixels, which (for me at least) is way too big on the vertical axis. The way a photo is presented does have an impact on how one perceives it - for better or worse. Just my two cents worth on that topic.
Anyway, it's still a really nice photo. <g>
cheers,
frank
======
Actually, I do size my photo 650 pixels wide (it's the size I settled on that
worked -- fitted all on screen). Except, oops, I sized it 650 WIDE, instead
of 650 LONG (because it's vertical). I don't shoot vertical that often. So
thanks for pointing it out. Mea culpa.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
