The Photosmart V2 (USB) that I had did work better in ways, and with the
right registry tweaks gave me workable 36 bit scans to edit. But I always
thought mine was somewhat soft. Comparatively, when the RFS3600 gets it
right (focus wise), the results are pretty darn good (ref. the images I
posted earlier this evening).
Cheers,
Gerald
(on a virtual Friday night before gallivanting off to Paris in another
whirlwind round of courting my dream woman).
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: Kodak RFS 3600 Scanner comments (cont.)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: May 24, 2001 11:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Kodak RFS 3600 Scanner comments (cont.)
>
>
> > Gee,
> >
> > I was thinking about this scanner for a future purchase.
> Thanks for the
> > warning. That does beg the question of batch scanning. My
> Minolta Scan
> > Dual 2 does up to 6 frames, but you have to put the strip into
> a carrier
> > that isn't tight enough to hold the film still so the film
> will creep
> > sometimes causing less than full frame scan. It also has to
> do an index and
> > then the real scan. That means you have to nurse it along.
> No walking
> > away. So, it is better than 1 at a time, but not by much.
> I'm not that
> > happy with it. Anybody out there happy with a sub $1000.00
> scanner?
>
> I still like my Photosmart model 1. I have heard the version 2
> (S20) is better.
> William Robb
>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
