Thanks to all who commented on this one. Ambiguity and interpretation
it is.
- Marco
On Mar 15, 2005, at 3:45 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Thanks for showing that a number of scenarios might fit any given
scene!
Especially if you didn't see what led up to it, and were not privy to
anything after! <g>
I think that's one good thing about a good "street scene" like that.
If it's sufficiently ambiguous, it keeps your attention for some time,
and with luck, generates a lot of conversation...
and
On Mar 15, 2005, at 2:23 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:52:11 -0500, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Thus demonstrating that "communication" is in the eye of the beholder.
Isn't that what art's about? It's not just what the artist intends to
convey, but what I as viewer am able to take from the art, regardless
of the intention of the artist.
I think it's called "interpretation".
