Hi, I'm far from an expert here, but some time ago a few list members and friends sent me numerous RAW files from the istD, a Nikon D70, a Canon (10D I think), and another Nikon (more grown up than the D70). I ran them all through the Adobe RAW converter and played with them, and I also ran the same images through the DNG converter. I couldn't see any difference. However, don't consider my comments to be indicative of a final verdict. Perhaps more like polling the jury <LOL>>
Shel > [Original Message] > From: David Zaninovic > So what is the final verdict on DNG vs PEF ? What do I lose by converting PEF to DNG ? Do I lose any picture information or just > metadata, like which lens was used and other things I don't really need. I need size reduction from 13MB to 5MB, that is a huge > difference. If I have to keep PEF-s then there is no reason to use DNG.
