Jostein wrote: > It's a long step from just stating the one sentence "The 645 lenses > are no more expensive (or larger) than high-end Canon lenses", to > actually pointing out that this applies to one quite specific setup > tailored to one person's needs. Now you've done so, and we all know > the scope of your statement. > > The world is always more complicated than one-liners, isn't it? :-)
Sure. My main point is that you cannot dismiss MF on size and weight alone, something thats often done, when compared to high-end 35mm gear. It seems like Pentax will continue the compact trend with digital 645. However, the biggest problem with this camera is that it seem incredibly ugly. I hope sombody tells them that none of the prototypes are acceptable in the looks department. Pål
