Jack, I may have missed prior posts, but I was trying to elaborate on the "rule" itself.
Kenneth Waller -----Original Message----- From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Mar 22, 2005 1:52 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: PESO: Nearing sunset Ken, I thought that's what I just wrote below..(?) Jack --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From a compositional standpoint, centered can lead > to a "static" image, as opposed to the "rule of > thirds" which tends to lead the viewers eye. Does > that mean that centered should be avoided? - No. > Just like the rule of thirds won't automatically > make an image stronger. > > PS rules are meant to be broken. > > Kenneth Waller > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Mar 22, 2005 1:15 PM > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: PESO: Nearing sunset > > Shel, > My perverse way of discounting photo "rules" in > general. > IOW, don't get the idea I'm making a suggestion > simply > because It's considered a compositional "rule". > A bit oblique, I suppose. > > Jacl > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > What's the "rule" about centering buildings? > Never > > heard of such a rule. > > > > Shel > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: Jack Davis > > > > > Too much non-reflective water. Even though it's > a > > > "rule", I'd still like the buildings to be other > > than > > > centered. > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > ________________________________________ > PeoplePC Online > A better way to Internet > http://www.peoplepc.com > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
