On 24 Mar 2005 at 8:33, Jack Davis wrote:

> I've always thought the tubular viewfinder shape an
> uncomplimentary design feature. Can't say why. Maybe
> it's the "peek-a-boo" squint inducing suggestion of
> it.
> It does allow more display and control area which, I
> imagine, is the idea.
> I'd like to see design "D".

They created a rod for their backs using this style of telescopic eye relief in 
their film cameras, I've never found it comfortable to work with (I've owned 
and used 3 separate P645 systems over the years) and it's the most fragile part 
of the system too, I've had to repair two of mine. The small light prism design 
plus the space required to house the film cartridge and the requirement to 
minimize weight lead to the need to approach the finder design in this manner. 
They could now do far better on the new design but it seems they have hung onto 
the old system, possibly to reduce cost or maybe sadly to preserve the visual 
connection with the old film system.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to