Hello Francis, I can highly recommend it. It is optically extremely good - and gives you the reach on the wide end. 16mm is visibly wider than the 20mm - you are comparing about a 24mm to 30mm in 35mm terms. Quite a difference.
Here are some shots I've made with the lens: http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_0805.htm http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0017.htm http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0100.htm http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0026.htm http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0065.htm http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0079.htm http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0028.htm http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0032.htm -- Best regards, Bruce Monday, March 28, 2005, 8:07:05 AM, you wrote: FA> Thanks Bruce. FA> I really love that 50. Now I am getting the bug and FA> starting to look for more lenses. Perhaps I'll try FA> the 16-45 DA lens. Any opinions on that one? It FA> would make for a nice travel lens. That way I won't FA> have to keep switching lenses from an A 20mm to the FA> 50. FA> Francis FA> ------------------------------ FA> Sunday, March 27, 2005, 23:55:18 -0800, you wrote: FA> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:55:18 -0800 FA> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FA> To: Francis Alviar <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> FA> Subject: Re: PESO: Concentrate FA> Message-ID: FA> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FA> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii FA> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FA> Cute image - gotta love that 50mm!
