> Not to mention the fact that the manual focus 20/2.8 and the > autofocus 20/2.8 are optically IDENTICAL. ;-)
True, absolutely. It would come down to sample variation if anything .8) John ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:23:06 -0500 Subject: Re: I'm surprised that this one didn't attract a single bid > "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Asside from all the arguments over which are superior manual or AF lenses if > >we come back to the original post regarding the A 20mm f/2.8, how useful do > >you think AF really is at 20mm? > > Not to mention the fact that the manual focus 20/2.8 and the > autofocus 20/2.8 are optically IDENTICAL. ;-) > > -- > Mark Roberts > Photography and writing > www.robertstech.com ------- End of Original Message -------
