On 5 Apr 2005 at 8:24, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > The Luminous Landscape has an article by Pete Myers on the value of > post-production editing for photographers: > > "What I am suggesting is that the real power of photography in our modern > digital age is in using the computer in making an image... I really don't > care all that much about what the picture looks like that I took in the > field — I care about what I can make of the image in postproduction. > Certainly that does not excuse me from doing my best in taking a picture in > the > field, but the point is what happens in the field is not an end all – it's a > beginning." > > Any comments on this?
Surely it's the end result that counts? Digital work-flow has allowed me to circumvent many equipment weaknesses and produce better final prints regardless of the capture media. So I think it's fairly accurate taken in context. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
