> fra: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 6/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: > > >I guess you're being facetious. But I think most photojournalists are > >quite dedicated to truth. There are always violators but by and large I > >think photojournalists are a noble and honest lot. > > Agreed. First hand experence.
So, if this honest and noble photojournalist tells you that the pictures shows the truth as he understood it, does it matter if the picture is altered? DagT
