On 4/13/05, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Well this is a comment you'll probably ignore. If the photo is intended to > be an environmental statement, then I can understand it in that context. I > suspect that is what you intended. > > Other than that, I also suspect you and I wouldn't hang it on our > study/den/library walls... > > We typically try to crop the soda bottles out, yes? :)
Well, I don't want to make this into a huge discussion, but: a) Just because he left in the pop bottles (we call it "pop" in some - but not all - parts of Canada), does he have to be making an environmental statement? Is he making a statement at all? Or is he just showing a photo, and letting the viewer decide what the statement is? b) Not all photos have to be pretty to be good. Look at mine. They're rarely pretty. And, they're rarely good. Wait, that's not a very good argument, is it? Well, you know what I mean. <vbg> cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
