I suspect it is a difference in the type of shooting we do.  When I
shoot a wedding or event, I will be processing somewhere between
300-1,000 images at a time.  The vast majority are keepers - just
don't know if they are sellers.  Many times, the most artistic shots
are not the ones people buy.  They buy based on WHO is in the picture
more than how good the picture is.

When I first tried C1, I only did it on a few images and also found
that it seemed a bit much.  Later, I tried again with a batch of 200
images and suddenly found out why it had good workflow.  It really was
designed to be a high volume, batching system.  Most of the others
were designed to process a single image with batching added later.

Based on your description of how you shoot and work, I suspect that it
wouldn't be a great benefit to you.  I did run through the RawShooter
tutorials and it seems much more up your alley.  Basically, it does a
fast slideshow of your raw images with you quickly marking them with a
priority 1,2 or 3.  Then you go back through the 1's and adjust and
convert them, then the 2's and 3's if you care to.  It supports some
batching stuff too, but more like culling style.  It's free right now,
so it wouldn't hurt to try.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Friday, April 15, 2005, 10:21:31 PM, you wrote:

BL> Hi!

>> You can batch process with the PSCS Raw Converter. Just dial in
>> the first shot, choose those settings as your default and fire off
>> the rest of them. Simple and efficient.
>> Paul

BL> Furthermore, it works the same way in PSE. What I learned from Jostein
BL> and a little time I spent with C1s was that you could do more things
BL> (such as curves) looking at RAW file. So, basically C1 would give you
BL> final picture at its output.

BL> Personally I've found C1 too complex. I usually use batch mode of PSE to
BL> get previews and then manually process 1-5% of the images that I find I
BL> like...

BL> After all, my switch to digital did not increase my rate of keepers. To
BL> that extent, I don't care how good/bad non-keepers are processed :). Do you?

BL> Boris



Reply via email to